I feared it would either be worthless or game breaking and so far they've done neither. At the moment, it looks like I might be eating crow about the buffs. For those more dedicated and professional, this is probably a very interesting time, especially since the decks themselves aren't easy to master.ġ.

We're at the point we would normally be at 1 month into the expansion, where most of the tiers are set though their cards aren't solid and there may still be a few surprises coming later on.įor the majority of the playerbase, staleness should be just now creeping in. Many of these decks are still being figured out as far as who beats who and tech options. I think there's still room to build off of this meta over at that top end. It suggests that Hunter is being seen as the cheapest/easiest class to rank up with but it's NOT the strongest. The 'hunter wins!' is mostly in the lower ranks. One thing to note is that in the Legend rank we have a very close race here with Hunter and Warrior in a dead heat, Mage and Rogue right next to them, and Shaman close enough to matter as well. What do you think? Do you see more margin of development after the mid-term buffs? Or are we approaching staleness already, no matter what? But I guess Rogue players knew that already. So Hunter confirmed as the most popular class in the meta, yet Rogue seems to be able to resist, despite the nerfs.

Viscous cyndicate